THELIFTEDVEIL

UNVEILING DEPTH. CHALLENGING PERCEPTION.

Is Physiognomy Really A Pseudoscience?

Is Physiognomy Really A Pseudoscience?
The supposed art of judging character from facial characteristics.

Do we not live under the guidance of the words, "the eyes are the window to the soul?"

What is it about this abstract material truth that we suspiciously encounter the divine playing with us under? We know a person’s eyes reveal to us a metaphysical truth about that individual that we need not see, nor need to imagine where it could lead us, or where we have seen this similar bodily expression happen in our otherworldly displays, in other animals, and in other locations of strange happenings.

Of course, these are tailored to our presuppositions and judgments before meeting the person so much that we may inspect and use this course of action acutely. But there does seem to be some fragment of truth in this. Below you will see the various eyes and faces of murderers and people that have taken others' lives in horrific ways. By way of illustration, I aim to demonstrate a point that I shall expand on further.

School Shooters
RICHARD RAMIREZ

  • Richard Ramirez
  • School Shooters
  • Edmund Kemper
  • Ted Bundy
  • Green River Killer

Conclusions?

Disheveled, ungroomed, and preoccupied with something beyond them, their self-preservation keeps this often ignored. Something so beyond that it is a sacrificial attempt at reordering themselves through the killing practices of other humans.

Perhaps notice how each of their eyes is stark, fierce, and contains a multilayered set of violence, psychosis, and brutality behind them. Each one of these men combined has killed over 250 people.

If we apply "the eyes are the window to the soul" here, it very well does appear that whatever life is being lived behind those doors was an unpleasant and hauntingly active one, and its flow flew through the limbs and body of these men.

Is the right question to ask: Would you notice immediately the darkness inside these individuals if you had not known what they had achieved in their living life by sheer judgment alone?

  • Would you walk on the other side of the road?
  • Would you get the sense of your hairs standing up on the back of your necks?
  • Or would you see these people as people that have suffered in some form of way?

All these questions that come to us during our prejudgments arise from simply glaring at a photo of somebody that we are aware has a past that we cannot relate to within any fathom of the human moral law.

The idea "DO NOT JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER!" is actually, in our personal relationship to it, inverted in regards to these scenarios. We most definitely should be applying "judging a book by its cover" in many of the cases of serial killers such as Ed Kemper and Ted Bundy. Both of them had survivors that lived, that both men decided in their daunting kindness to let go. That is a fragile line between having this judgmental intuitive ability and being naïve, which brought these people to their fates and deaths.

  • Ask yourself if perhaps you may find some of their facial features friendly and convincing.
  • Ask yourself if you have an instinct to care, aid, or help any of the men in the photos. -Perhaps there is a need to insist they seek help.
  • Was an instinct towards altruism performed from just seeing their faces?

Some of these answers, if you are honest, perhaps are the results and reasons why these individuals were successful, using these outer features as a self-conscious vital tool towards their sustainability in crime and allowing them to engage with the public in their shape-shifting demonic-like flare with ease.

Another term we like to use is "I get a bad feeling about him." These types of prejudgments, let’s call them that, are related to the physiognomy science in the way that they have arisen from an intuitive first-hand sight-seeing problem that can be witnessed without having any personal relation to the individual or perhaps feeling their presence as a slight sensation.

This may stumble into some of you. These "intuitions," complemented with dark alleys, silent hospitals, and liminal spaces where you see another, then you both become the same experience; you both inherit the bad feeling about one another. This extends past the facial dilemmas; the study of physiognomy should be the pan-science of telepathy with hinges of precognition.

Precognition/ˌpriːkɒɡˈnɪʃn/
noun
1.foreknowledge of an event, especially as a form of extrasensory perception.

All of which we live by these faculties, we do tend to seek the face out as the focal point of the being we are in presence with.

Now Let Us Look At The Physiognomy of the Great Accomplishing Men of Our Civilisation

Alexander The Great
  • Napoleon Bonaparte
  • Adolf Hitler
  • Winston Churchill
  • Caesar
  • Alexander the Great
  • Albert Einstein

There is a difference immediately. I contrasted these because I wanted to show the parameters of society's inner constructs and the mediums that come and flow through them. We have the lowest of the low, and we have what we call here heroes, saviors, legends, all rightfully figures of myth. Men who strove to overcome something greater for their people, men whose lives were devoted to overcoming this human condition and using that inner human power to flourish into extended ideals for civilization to strive for in the unattainable quests of pursuits we like to name, in the great search of my soul.

These people command—command is important here—they command something. Their facial designs are the completed commandments of some form of kinesics or motivation to shift the dynamics of life from chaos to order or the delivery of it being limitless. Their faces are crafted from staring likewise with the above at something greater than themselves. Only in these cases, we can find that thing that is above them all is unified under the need to be driven. What we perhaps outline in this thing I am circulating around is the body instinct, the body consciousness, the consciousness in the body. What we can witness here is the dark and the light.

Let us not forget the reasons why these images color the characters of our immediate neurons emerging from their projections. We understand these figures of the past to be Übermensch, men who have overcome overcoming. We notice this immediately, and their aristocratic polishings make headway for the conviction to be even easier for us. Yet, beyond our precognitive abilities that we may apply here correctly, the shapes of faces of certain characters that have tasted life in a manner that many ever have.

Their consciousness has molded their face as they glare into the future seeking the fruits of their fates.

I ask can you can tell a worm from a lion?

This answer is objectively yes, every time. You will say yes. You can tell a worm from a lion, and vice versa. Here we find ourselves finding the difference from the low vibrational murderer to the larger-than-life leader, the greater human. Simply and purely based on their faces. Their faces are molded by what their minds and eyes contend with daily. The worm, if used applicably for the reference point of the first section of photos, shows us these animals are negative in their DNA wiring. Something is off beyond the scales of psychology; they are almost a virus, a bacteria, and they look it. The other men look fuller; their eyes hold something beyond evil. It is a sense of novelty, royalty, and above gameplay of human life.

To outline a point here, I want to illustrate the effects of drugs on people's faces and then furthermore how their character slides beneath something, open and dark.

On the Faces of The Addicts

It is clear the conclusion to physiognomy as a science is a meritable inquisition. You can most definitely judge a person’s character based upon their facial characteristics. It should also be noted that the reason these faces change in the way they do, as in all cases, is that it is due to some transformation of character that characterizes the face.

Furthermore, we could imply the notion that their character transformation could be so radical that it would reverse the internal character of the individual—so radical that they may be brand new. Like men who have seen battle, their eyes are stained permanently with an evil. The killers embody this temperance already as they glare into their evil natures themselves, but in the strivers, the men who overcame the human condition and evolved past it, their faces were sharper and bold.

That is the indication of physiognomy, that whilst it may be a pseudoscience, it certainly indicates that our psyches themselves are transformative by the environment to which each psyche rests within.