A LOOK INTO CANCEL CULTURE AND ITS INDICATIONS
Cancel culture? The prognosis for a serious issue. We must take note of this occurrence in the world; it is useful to look at this as an insight into the modern world as it unfolds.
What does it mean for people to be "cancelled" for expressing opinions? They are removed from popular social platforms with a potential stamp on their name, a black marker next to their identity for restriction amongst the public eye. This is part of a bigger problem: a problem that circulates around confinement, total restriction, pressure on speech, and a dominance for control of speech. Effectively and literally, it is a move that demonstrates certain powers and groups of people in high positions that want to confine our greatest tool and trap our navigation systems into a corner of an impure and reduced way of verbal dialogue.
The agenda is obvious, is it not?
It is clear that there are aims and goals that come with restricting public speech and speech in general. The aim that comes to the frontier is that whoever is dictating what conversations are allowed to take place, as opposed to not taking place, are testing the public. Reducing the public's capacity for cultural individual relations, intimate understanding and empathetically wiring duty and honour, one instinctively has for the human race. They find themselves listening, hearing, and engaging with a new tailored form of speech and dialogue, a new sort of language that, perhaps, in the near future, we will distinguish as 'Pre Cancel Culture' and 'Post Cancel Culture.' This simply means to effectively rewire the spectators' cognition through installing yes and no markers around their language games.
There are a few people who have been cancelled that have faced more serious consequences within this paradigm. Some have had their bank accounts seized.
This indicates that there is a force that wants any popular member of the celebrity realm to abide by these newly established language models, or else they will pay the price. Removing somebody from social media platforms for speaking things that are unconventional is one method, another being tailored to people who summon large followings from garnering a large influence both from their being and from their messages marketed.
The online platforms are being watched by the hour, stalked. Anyone who wants to speak freely and think correctly without fear, and to stake their souls in truth, is being targeted. This raises many concerns. One of the most crucial concerns is that those who dictate what is allowed and what isn't are aligned with a worldview that is sadistic and autocratic, with certain elements of Machiavellian tendencies.
Who would want truth and honesty killed?
The term 'fake news' has recently made its appearance onto the zeitgeist memorandum; it comes with a certain angst to the word. The media have certainly lost their credentials in the last five years. The public seems to sense something is off about their cycles and report timings. Here is a clip of the news channels' operation styles, shall we say.
'Sinclair's Soldiers'
You're wrong to think that this is only happening in the States; this is happening through an international network of media outlets. They are all taking part in inflicting the public with fear, confusion, and directing them with a false sense of trust and hope. Fearmongering is a more suited term, the trade for the victory.
Modern-day speech has been catastrophically redesigned. Yes, the shorts we watch from the algorithms are on and off, though content has become more elusive. The force and the pressure that hang over social platforms are not entirely always noticed, with sexual content being totally available. This is a second caution to this overall issue: they confine speech but elevate sexuality. This makes sense when you see their agenda.
Pay attention out there, to everything you see online; it's where your mind is targeted.
Beware, folks.
THELIFTEDVEIL OUT.
Comments ()